electricdawn
Aktives Mitglied
- Dabei seit
- 01.12.2004
- Beiträge
- 11.820
- Reaktionspunkte
- 9.322
Aus diesem Bericht:
PS: Noch ein Zitat:
Liest sich für mich, als ob der Kauf des Nanotextur-Glases für manche Nutzer eine klare Sache ist. Nicht jeder braucht es, aber für manche ist es ein echter Gewinn.The nano-texture display, on the other hand, makes those two studio lights almost appear as if they didn’t exist, while allowing macOS to self-regulate brightness levels.
To be clear, the nano-texture is far superior to other matte display coatings that I’ve used in the past.
Things like text and images don’t appear quite as tack sharp as they do on the glossy display as a result of the nano-texture.
PS: Noch ein Zitat:
While both the standard glass and nano-texture glass options of 5K iMac are engineered for extremely low reflectivity, the nano-texture glass is far and away better at reducing reflectivity. With this in mind, the choice is relatively simple. If you work in an environment where you constantly find yourself battling reflections, then pay the $500 for the nano-texture glass. If, however, you can control ambient lighting, or at least live with a few minimal reflections, not only will the glossy display save you money, but it will look a little better as well.