In einem der (sehr lesenswerten) Artikel auf theinquirer.net heißt es zu den betroffenen Nvidia-Baureihen:
"How widespread is the problem? We told you about G84 and G86s as well as G92 and G94s. From the materials side, it appears that all non-R and non-F lot numbered parts made on the 65nm and 55nm processes are defective. The flaw is a downright idiotic choice of multiple materials coupled with poor chip design and inadequate testing. It is a case of errors compounding errors. They are all defective."
"It appears that every Nvidia 65nm and 55nm part with high lead bumps and/or low Tg underfill are defective, it is just a question of how defective they are, and when they will die."
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1036374/nv-should
In einem Forum heißt es sogar zu Desktop-GPUs - die ja im Durchschnitt viel weniger Erwärmungs/Abkühlungszyklen pro Zeiteinheit ausgesetzt sind als solche in Notebooks:
"So it's not a question of IF desktop parts will fail, but WHEN."
nVidia Caught Lying Again (Say it aint so)
(siehe Post #86)
Walter.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
